Dividend vs growth calculator
Both funds get the same total return here. Only the split between dividends and price growth changes — which isolates what the yield actually does.
After 25 years
The lower-yield fund ends $24,148 ahead — not because it returned more, but because in a taxable account the dividend-heavy fund paid tax every year on income it had no choice about receiving.
Both funds are given the same total return here on purpose, to isolate the effect of the split. Real funds differ in total return too, and dividend tax treatment depends on the type of dividend and your bracket. Check any fund’s own documents and current tax rules at irs.gov before drawing conclusions about your own holdings.
A dividend is not extra money
When a company pays a dividend, cash leaves the business and arrives in your account. The company is worth that much less afterwards, and the share price reflects it. You have not gained anything at the moment of payment — you have moved value from one pocket to another.
This is why total return is the number that matters. Total return is dividends plus price change. A fund yielding 4% with 4% price growth and a fund yielding 1% with 7% price growth have both returned 8%. They are the same result, arranged differently.
Hold total return fixed above, as the calculator does, and the two funds land in exactly the same place — until tax enters.
Where the split does matter: tax
In a taxable brokerage account, dividends are generally taxed in the year they are received, whether or not you wanted the cash. Price appreciation is not taxed until you sell, which means it compounds untaxed in the meantime.
So at equal total return, a dividend-heavy holding can end up behind in a taxable account — not because it earned less, but because it was forced to settle tax along the way. Tick and untick the taxable box above to see the size of that effect.
In a tax-advantaged retirement account, this difference largely disappears, which is why the same two funds can be a reasonable or a poor choice depending only on which account they sit in.
The case for dividends that survives the math
None of this makes dividend investing wrong. There are arguments for it that do not depend on dividends being free money:
- Income without selling. A retiree who wants cash flow can take dividends instead of deciding what to sell and when. That is a real convenience, and behaviourally it can be easier to live with.
- A different mix of companies. Funds screening for dividends end up holding a different set of businesses than the broad market, which is a genuine tilt — just one to make knowingly.
- It keeps people invested. Seeing income arrive helps some investors hold through downturns. A strategy you stick with beats a better one you abandon.
What does not survive the math is the idea that a high yield is extra return on top of growth. It is part of the return, and in a taxable account it is the part taxed soonest.
What this ignores
Steady returns and a constant yield, neither of which is real. It also assumes dividends are reinvested, and it does not model the tax owed when you eventually sell — which the growth fund defers rather than escapes.
Dividend tax treatment depends on the type of dividend and on your bracket, and the rules change. Check current rules at irs.gov and any fund’s own documents before applying this to real holdings.
Related: why a dividend is not free money
Educational only. This explains how these products and accounts work in general. It is not financial, tax, or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy anything. Your situation is specific to you — check with a licensed professional before acting.